伯恩斯坦分析师认为对铜征收50%的关税不合逻辑 不会实施

Core Viewpoint - Bernstein's commodity analysts argue against the implementation of a proposed 50% tariff on copper imports, labeling it as illogical and potentially destructive [1][2]. Group 1: Tariff Implications - The proposed 50% tariff on approximately 900,000 tons of copper, priced at $10,000 per ton, would result in an additional cost of $4.5 billion [2]. - The policy is expected to increase costs for U.S. manufacturers without incentivizing rational economic behavior [2]. - Bernstein highlights that the U.S. has only two major smelting plants, and building a new smelting facility typically takes five years and costs $6 billion, making it unlikely for domestic smelters to expand capacity due to tariffs [2]. Group 2: Trade Relationships - Bernstein suggests that imposing a 50% tariff on other countries while exempting friendly trade partners like Chile, Canada, and Peru could resolve the issue [3]. - The global smelting industry is currently facing severe economic challenges, with processing/refining fees being negative [2]. - Bernstein anticipates that logic will prevail in trade discussions, allowing for some leeway for friendly trade partners [2].