“反内卷”与上一轮供给侧结构性改革的比较

Group 1 - The core objective of the "anti-involution" policy is to address low-price and disorderly competition, guiding companies to enhance product quality and promoting the orderly exit of backward production capacity, thereby optimizing and upgrading the industrial structure to improve China's global economic and industrial competitiveness [1] - The "anti-involution" policy shares similarities with the supply-side structural reform initiated in 2015, focusing on technological innovation, product differentiation, and sustainable development of the industrial chain [1] Group 2 - The macroeconomic context for "anti-involution" is more complex compared to previous reforms, and it encompasses a broader range of industries, including emerging sectors like photovoltaics and new energy vehicles, in addition to traditional industries [2] - The focus of the "anti-involution" policy is on enhancing domestic core competitiveness and transitioning from quantity competition to quality improvement, emphasizing green and low-carbon transformation [2] - The policy measures for "anti-involution" are more diversified and rely on the construction of a unified national market, emphasizing legal frameworks and fair competition, unlike the more administrative measures used in the supply-side structural reform [2] Group 3 - Both the 2015 supply-side structural reform and "anti-involution" aim to resolve structural issues in the economy, optimizing resource allocation and improving economic quality and efficiency [3] - The supply-side structural reform was primarily focused on eliminating ineffective low-end supply and optimizing economic structure, while "anti-involution" addresses the challenges of disordered low-price competition that harms cash flow and industry health [3] - The "anti-involution" initiative is expected to have a longer duration, focusing on long-term institutional construction to enhance industry competitiveness [2][3]