再揭“南海仲裁案”及其“裁决”的非法底色（国际论坛）

Core Viewpoint - The resolution of the South China Sea issue requires patience and restraint from all parties involved, emphasizing the importance of international law and cooperation to maintain peace and stability in the region [1][3]. Group 1: Arbitration and International Law - The so-called "arbitration ruling" undermines the principles of international law and the credibility of dispute resolution mechanisms, as it was established without the consent of all parties involved [2][3]. - The arbitration tribunal disregarded the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) by making decisions on territorial sovereignty, which is not within its jurisdiction [2]. Group 2: Geopolitical Influences - The establishment of the arbitration tribunal was influenced by geopolitical motives, particularly by external powers aiming to strengthen alliances and influence regional dynamics [2]. - The tribunal's actions, including allowing the Philippines to submit additional evidence beyond reasonable time limits, reflect a bias that deviates from standard international legal practices [2]. Group 3: Implications for Future Resolutions - The South China Sea issue is complex, involving multiple countries and intertwined territorial and maritime disputes, which cannot be resolved by a single arbitration ruling [3]. - China's rejection of the arbitration ruling is aimed at preserving the integrity and authority of international law, and it calls for a collaborative approach to address the South China Sea disputes [3].