越权管辖、偷换概念、重设标准……谁才是“南海仲裁案裁决”幕后推手→

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ninth anniversary of the South China Sea arbitration ruling, emphasizing China's rejection of the ruling and the support it has received from over 100 countries, while highlighting the historical and legal context surrounding the issue [1]. Group 1: Historical Context - The South China Sea arbitration tribunal issued a ruling on July 12, 2016, which denied China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea, based on a unilateral request from the Philippines [1]. - Scholars argue that international treaties established after World War II, such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, confirmed China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands [4]. Group 2: Legal and Procedural Critique - Experts criticize the arbitration ruling for its numerous legal errors, including the tribunal's overreach in jurisdiction and the flawed process that allowed only one party to participate [4][7]. - The tribunal's interpretation of residency standards has been questioned, with comparisons made to U.S. territories that do not meet the same criteria [6]. Group 3: Geopolitical Implications - The article highlights the role of the United States in supporting the Philippines' claims and actions in the South China Sea, which has escalated tensions in the region [7][9]. - Experts call for a cessation of external interference in South China Sea matters, advocating for direct dialogue and negotiation between China and ASEAN countries [11].