Workflow
专家:铜关税不会让美国制造业“再次伟大”
Zhi Tong Cai Jing·2025-07-14 03:46

Core Viewpoint - The proposal by President Trump to impose a 50% tariff on imported copper reflects a chaotic economic policy that hinders the development of U.S. manufacturers both now and in the future [1] Group 1: Economic Impact - Increasing the cost of copper for Americans will make U.S. aircraft manufacturing less attractive, giving competitors from Europe, Brazil, and Canada an advantage [1] - The tariff could exacerbate the already challenging situation for the U.S. shipbuilding industry, which relies heavily on protectionist policies [1] - The U.S. imports most of its copper from Chile, Canada, and Peru, indicating a reliance on foreign suppliers, particularly China for certain materials [1] Group 2: Domestic Copper Industry - The U.S. has a strong domestic copper industry that accounts for about half of the copper used in the country, primarily sourced from Arizona [2] - There are concerns that raising the price of a widely used production material will weaken U.S. competitiveness in key industries [2] Group 3: Historical Context and Policy Analysis - Historical leaders believed in active government involvement to promote industrialization, contrasting with Trump's approach which may overlook the complexities of modern economies [3] - The focus on resource extraction and primary commodity production could lead to deindustrialization, undermining the goal of becoming a manufacturing powerhouse [3][4] - Trump's tariff policies may raise the prices of essential inputs, potentially stifling capital accumulation necessary for manufacturing growth [4] Group 4: Labor and Skills Consideration - A serious industrial policy should consider establishing visa programs for skilled workers in sectors like semiconductors, batteries, and shipbuilding [5] - The importance of copper lies in its use for manufacturing other goods, suggesting that trade policies should aim to enhance production capabilities rather than hinder them [5]