Workflow
特朗普通告全球,不许反美,关键时刻,中方先给美一记下马威
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-07-14 05:03

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent actions taken by the Trump administration to impose tariffs on various countries, particularly targeting those that support the BRICS nations, reflecting a broader strategy to maintain U.S. economic dominance amid rising global competition [1][3][5]. Group 1: Tariff Imposition - On July 7, Trump signed an executive order threatening to impose tariffs ranging from 25% to 40% on 14 countries, including Japan and South Korea, starting August 1 [1]. - Trump warned that any country supporting BRICS' "anti-American policies" would face an additional 10% tariff [1]. Group 2: U.S. Economic Strategy - The U.S. has historically leveraged its economic and military power to pursue a hegemonic policy, which has intensified under Trump's administration through aggressive tariff measures [3]. - The rise of BRICS nations poses a significant challenge to U.S. economic hegemony, as these countries have been making substantial advancements in various sectors, increasing their global economic share [3][5]. Group 3: Response from BRICS Nations - In response to U.S. tariffs, BRICS nations collectively expressed serious concern and criticized the unilateral measures taken by the U.S. during their summit in Rio de Janeiro [5]. - The joint statement from BRICS members indicates a commitment to cooperation and resistance against U.S. threats, highlighting a unified front against economic coercion [5]. Group 4: China's Role - China plays a crucial role within BRICS and has implemented countermeasures against the U.S., such as tightening exports of critical resources like rare earth elements, which are vital for high-tech industries [7]. - The U.S. faces challenges in finding alternative sources for these materials, which could lead to significant setbacks in its related industries [7]. Group 5: Future Implications - The article suggests that the ongoing resistance from BRICS and China's strategic responses indicate a decline in U.S. hegemony, with a potential shift towards a multipolar international order [7].