特朗普惹上事了，巴西对美打出3连击，日本这时候对美也硬气到底

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the resurgence of trade tensions under Trump's administration, highlighting the challenges faced by the U.S. in maintaining its global leadership as countries like Brazil and Japan respond assertively to new tariffs [1][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policies - Trump's new tariffs have reignited global trade conflicts, with significant backlash from countries such as Brazil and Japan [1][3]. - The "America First" policy has led to strained relations with traditional allies, as countries reassess their economic ties with the U.S. [3][4]. - The imposition of tariffs results in increased costs for imported goods, ultimately affecting consumers and businesses [3]. Group 2: Brazil's Response - Brazil has emerged as a key player, surpassing the U.S. to become China's largest soybean supplier, reflecting its discontent with U.S. hegemony [3][4]. - In response to U.S. tariffs, Brazil enacted the "Commercial Reciprocity Law," imposing a 50% tariff on U.S. goods and seeking new trade partnerships [12][17]. - Brazil's government highlighted a $410 billion trade surplus with the U.S. over the past 15 years, countering Trump's claims of trade deficits [10][12]. Group 3: Japan's Reaction - Japan's automotive industry faces severe impacts from a 25% tariff on imports, prompting strong criticism from Prime Minister Kishida [7][14]. - Japan's government has adopted a firmer stance against U.S. policies, emphasizing the need to protect national interests [14][17]. - The ongoing tariff disputes have led Japan to reconsider its economic relationship with the U.S., aligning more closely with other global partners [4][19]. Group 4: Global Implications - The article suggests that the U.S. is losing its dominant position as more countries challenge unilateral trade practices [4][17]. - The responses from Brazil and Japan signal a broader trend of nations seeking equitable trade relationships, moving away from dependency on the U.S. [4][19]. - The future of U.S. global leadership is uncertain, hinging on its ability to navigate increasing international resistance to its trade policies [19].