“让我为 Firefox 付费！”

Core Viewpoint - The call for a paid version of Firefox by John Karahalis reflects a growing sentiment among users who are willing to financially support the browser to ensure its sustainability and independence from advertising revenue [1][8][13]. Group 1: User Sentiment and Support - Many users express a willingness to pay for Firefox, viewing it as a necessary step to preserve its quality and independence from ad-driven models [8][11]. - Users have shown disappointment with Mozilla's recent decisions, including changes to user data policies and executive compensation, which have contributed to a decline in trust [8][10][13]. Group 2: Financial Model and Sustainability - Karahalis argues that charging for Firefox does not contradict the principles of open-source software, as users who cannot afford to pay can still access free versions [5][6]. - There is a suggestion for Mozilla to explore a subscription model or premium version that offers additional features while maintaining the core product's integrity [11][12]. Group 3: Concerns and Criticism - Users are concerned about Mozilla's reliance on Google for revenue through default search engine agreements, which raises doubts about its ability to compete independently [11][12]. - The increase in executive salaries amidst declining revenues and market share has led to criticism regarding the allocation of funds and the overall direction of the company [8][10].