14国谈判没有进展，美国想和中国谈判，特朗普：我和中国关系很好

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that after negotiations with 14 countries broke down, the U.S. is now seeking to engage China, indicating a shift in strategy from hardline tactics to a more conciliatory approach [1][14][22] - The U.S. issued a "final ultimatum" to 14 countries, imposing punitive tariffs ranging from 25% to 40% on their products, which has led to a unified front among these nations against U.S. pressure [2][10][34] - The initial expectation that countries would yield to U.S. pressure has not materialized, with nations like Japan and South Korea taking a strong stance against U.S. tactics [3][5][28] Group 2 - The U.S. has only reached a framework agreement with the UK and Vietnam, while negotiations with other countries have failed, particularly in Southeast Asia [6][7] - The U.S. is facing internal pressure as domestic industries warn that increased tariffs on Asian components could lead to layoffs [10][32] - The article suggests that the U.S. strategy of using tariffs to reshape global supply chains is flawed, as it underestimates the complexity and interdependence of global manufacturing networks [39][40] Group 3 - The article highlights that the U.S. is now considering exemptions for certain Chinese products, indicating a potential shift in its approach to trade negotiations [20][22] - China's response to the U.S. overtures has been cautious, emphasizing that negotiations must be based on mutual respect and rejecting unilateral pressure [24][40] - The collective resistance from the 14 countries and China's measured response signal a significant challenge for the U.S. in its trade policy [26][34][43]