品牌线上控价策略，有哪些办法？

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of direct communication with low-priced sellers as a flexible preemptive measure to address pricing issues [1][3] - Effective communication can lead to significant results, with one fast-moving consumer goods brand achieving a 30% compliance rate among errant sellers, while communication costs were only 1/5 of other methods [3] - The success of this approach heavily relies on the cooperation of the sellers, suggesting the need for dedicated personnel to follow up and document interactions [3] Group 2 - Utilizing platform complaints for product delisting is highlighted as an efficient constraint within the rules framework, requiring a complete evidence chain for submission [4] - The success rate for properly submitted complaints can reach 80%, as demonstrated by a clothing brand that removed 62 low-priced links within a week, stabilizing price fluctuations from 25% to 8% [4] - The article outlines the potential penalties for offending stores, including point deductions and restrictions on platform activities [4] Group 3 - Legal intervention is presented as a final deterrent for stubborn sellers who ignore previous measures, advocating for a "gradient handling mechanism" [4] - This strategy balances cost efficiency and brand image while maintaining price order, starting with flexible communication, followed by platform rules, and culminating in legal action [4] - Sending warning letters drafted by professional law firms has proven effective, with a 3C brand achieving a 75% compliance rate within a week after sending 20 letters [5] Group 4 - Legal actions can be pursued against sellers who refuse to comply after receiving warning letters, with the possibility of civil lawsuits for damages [5] - The article notes that a beauty brand successfully obtained 500,000 yuan in compensation through litigation, setting a precedent to deter potential violators [5]