Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that the U.S. is advancing its arms sales strategy by providing advanced military equipment to Ukraine, with European countries covering the costs, aligning with the "America First" principle [1][3][5] - The U.S. Department of Defense analysts suggest that this approach will further deplete the resources of other NATO countries, making them more reliant on U.S. support [1][7] - The provision of the "Patriot" missile system is seen as a strategic move to maintain U.S. influence in NATO and prolong the conflict with Russia, despite its limitations against certain threats [9] Group 2 - Trump's administration is pushing for a fair and equitable relationship with European allies, insisting that they should bear the financial burden of military support to Ukraine [5] - The "Patriot" system, while advanced, is criticized for its ineffectiveness against specific Russian threats and its high operational costs, raising questions about its long-term viability in the conflict [9] - The overall strategy reflects a shift in U.S. defense policy, focusing on leveraging NATO partnerships to enhance American economic and military interests [3][5]
美国高调援乌背后是“卖武器 做生意” “美国优先”欲迫使北约国家消耗资源
Yang Shi Wang·2025-07-16 01:28