美国加密货币立法暂时受挫

Core Points - The U.S. House of Representatives is currently debating three significant cryptocurrency bills during "Crypto Week," including the GENIUS Act, the Clarity for Digital Assets Act, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act [2][3] - The GENIUS Act aims to establish clear rules for the issuance and operation of dollar-pegged stablecoins at the federal level, which is expected to strengthen the dollar's position in the global financial system [2][5] - There is a notable division among lawmakers regarding whether to advance the GENIUS Act as a standalone bill or to combine it with the other two bills, which could delay the legislative process [3][5] Legislative Process - On July 15, a procedural vote in the House resulted in a setback for the three bills, with 196 votes in favor and 223 against, including 13 dissenting Republican members [4] - Following this, former President Trump expressed support for the GENIUS Act and indicated that key lawmakers were aligned to vote in favor of it [4][6] - As of the afternoon of July 16, the House remained deadlocked on advancing the three cryptocurrency bills, with ongoing debates about potential combinations of the legislation [5][6] Industry Perspectives - There are two main factions within the industry regarding the legislative approach: the "bundlers," who advocate for combining all three bills for comprehensive reform, and the "pragmatists," who prefer to prioritize the GENIUS Act for quicker passage [6][7] - The bundlers, represented by major players like Coinbase, argue that a combined approach is necessary for effective market structure reform by 2025 [6] - The pragmatists emphasize the importance of passing the GENIUS Act quickly, viewing it as a significant step forward for the industry [6][7] Implications - If passed, these legislative measures could lead to a more regulated and transparent cryptocurrency industry, benefiting stakeholders and potentially enhancing the legitimacy of digital assets [7] - The ongoing debates reflect deeper interests and conflicts within the cryptocurrency sector, particularly regarding compliance and regulatory impacts on various stakeholders [6][7]