Core Viewpoint - The "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation," supported by the U.S. and Israel, has been criticized for failing to provide effective humanitarian aid and instead creating more tragedies, with at least 875 deaths reported near its distribution points [1][2][3] Group 1: Criticism of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation - The United Nations and many international aid organizations have refused to cooperate with the "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation," viewing it as serving Israeli military objectives and violating humanitarian principles [2][3] - The foundation has significantly reduced the number of aid distribution points from 400 to a maximum of 4, forcing people to travel long distances under dangerous conditions to receive aid [2][3] - Reports indicate that the distribution points are located in areas heavily controlled by Israeli forces, leading to incidents where Israeli soldiers have shot individuals collecting food [3][4] Group 2: Political Implications - The U.S. and Israel's support for the foundation aims to politicize and weaponize humanitarian aid, further tightening control over the Gaza situation [4][5] - Plans have been revealed to establish a "humanitarian city" in southern Gaza, which would require security checks for entry and effectively restrict movement for those who enter [6][7] - The foundation's operations are seen as a means to facilitate the forced migration of Palestinians, altering the demographic and territorial status of Gaza [6][7] Group 3: International Response - Over 165 international humanitarian organizations have condemned the foundation's actions, calling for its immediate cessation [3] - The international community, including the UN, has emphasized the need to restore humanitarian aid channels and oppose any unilateral changes to the status of Gaza [9][10] - Criticism from various global leaders highlights the foundation's actions as violations of international law and humanitarian principles [7][9]
美以所谓“援助”加剧加沙人道主义危机(环球热点)
Ren Min Ri Bao Hai Wai Ban·2025-07-17 22:46