俄罗斯被逼到墙角，普京火速派人访华，中方亮明态度，特朗普努力白费了

Group 1 - The article highlights the severe implications of the U.S. imposing a 100% punitive tariff on Russian goods if a ceasefire is not reached within 50 days, which could effectively sever the limited trade channels between the U.S. and Russia [1][5] - The U.S. Senator Graham's threat of imposing up to 500% tariffs on countries like China that maintain trade relations with Russia indicates a broader strategy to reshape global trade flows through economic coercion [1][3] - Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov's visit to China is seen as a strategic move to seek support from China amidst increasing Western pressure, emphasizing the importance of Sino-Russian cooperation [1][8] Group 2 - China's response to the U.S. tariffs is clear and consistent, with a strong opposition to unilateral sanctions and a commitment to political solutions for the Ukraine crisis, reflecting its independent foreign policy stance [3][6] - The current U.S.-Russia trade is nearly frozen, with a projected bilateral trade volume of only about $600 million in 2024, making the 100% tariff more of a political gesture than a practical measure [5][6] - The article suggests that the U.S. strategy of using tariffs as a weapon is facing challenges due to the resilience of major powers like China and Russia, indicating a potential failure of the U.S. approach to leverage tariffs to influence global dynamics [8]