Workflow
比美欧还坏!中国把第一次用在加拿大身上,这次绝不再有半点姑息
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-07-18 05:20

Group 1: Conflict Trigger - The conflict was triggered by Canada's unilateral imposition of tariffs on Chinese goods, particularly a 100% tariff on electric vehicles and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, effective October 1, 2024 [2][4] - Canada's actions were framed as a response to similar measures by the US and EU, but lacked substantial evidence and appeared hasty compared to the thorough investigations conducted by the US and EU [4][6] Group 2: China's Response - In response to Canada's tariffs, China initiated an anti-discrimination investigation against Canada on September 26, 2024, marking a significant move in international trade disputes [8][10] - China also launched an anti-dumping investigation on Canadian canola on September 9, 2024, targeting a key export commodity worth over 3 billion Canadian dollars in 2023 [10][12] Group 3: Historical Context - Diplomatic relations between China and Canada began in 1970, with a mutually beneficial trade relationship that peaked in the 2010s, where bilateral trade reached hundreds of billions of Canadian dollars [14][16] - The relationship soured significantly after the 2018 Meng Wanzhou incident, leading to a series of retaliatory measures and a decline in trust between the two nations [16] Group 4: International Implications - The dispute has broader international implications, with China's anti-discrimination investigation potentially setting a precedent for future trade conflicts, while Canada faces criticism for its unfounded tariff measures [17][19] - Canada has expressed strong condemnation of China's actions and plans to support affected industries, but the scale of assistance is limited, and there are calls for government compromise from the agricultural community [20] Group 5: Conclusion - The trade war illustrates the complexities of global trade dynamics and the lack of true winners, as both countries face economic repercussions and strained relations [21]