Hu Xiu·2025-07-19 01:17Group 1 - The core point of the article is the ongoing fierce competition among major food delivery platforms, particularly highlighted by JD's "Super Takeout Day" on July 18, which involved significant subsidies and promotional activities to attract consumers [2][4][54] - JD launched over 10 billion yuan in subsidies during the "Super Takeout Day," offering limited-time deals such as 16.18 yuan for small crayfish, while other platforms like Meituan and Taobao Flash Sale also provided substantial discounts [7][60] - The competition has led to a dramatic increase in order volumes, with some tea and coffee brands seeing their order share rise from 10%-15% to 25%-50% on major platforms [14][60] Group 2 - The subsidy war has resulted in a significant boost for delivery riders, with some reporting daily earnings exceeding 800 yuan due to the surge in orders, which have increased by 2-3 times compared to normal [9][50] - However, the intense competition has created disparities among merchants, with chain stores benefiting from increased online orders while smaller, offline-focused businesses struggle to maintain profitability [40][41] - The article notes that the ongoing subsidy battle has led to a collective rise in stock prices for upstream supply chain companies, with some experiencing multiple consecutive days of stock price increases [11][36] Group 3 - The article discusses the potential unsustainability of the subsidy war, as platforms are burning through substantial amounts of cash, with a reported total expenditure of 250 billion yuan in July alone [54][57] - Despite the short-term gains in order volume, there are concerns about the long-term viability of such aggressive promotional strategies, as they may not be sustainable for the platforms involved [57][59] - The article concludes with a note on the evolving consumer behavior, as many users who previously rarely ordered takeout are now doing so more frequently due to the attractive subsidies [61][62]