特朗普骂美联储主席鲍威尔“很糟糕”，却又不解雇，为了啥？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complex dynamics between President Trump and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, highlighting Trump's public criticism of Powell while refraining from dismissing him due to legal and political constraints [1][2][15]. Group 1: Trump's Criticism of Powell - Trump has openly criticized Powell, calling him names and expressing dissatisfaction with the Federal Reserve's high interest rates, which he believes are detrimental to the economy [1][3]. - The President's main grievance revolves around the high interest rates, which he argues increase government debt servicing costs significantly, especially with the national debt at $36 trillion [3][7]. - Trump's recent focus on the Federal Reserve's $2.5 billion renovation project is seen as an attempt to create a narrative against Powell, labeling it as wasteful spending [10][11]. Group 2: Legal and Political Constraints - The Federal Reserve operates under strict legal protections, making it difficult for Trump to dismiss Powell without substantial legal justification [1][2]. - Republican figures, including House Financial Services Committee Chairman Hill, have cautioned Trump against attempting to remove Powell, warning of potential legal repercussions and damage to the Fed's independence [2]. - Trump's political maneuvering is complicated by the need to maintain a stable economic environment, as any instability could backfire on his administration [13][15]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The article emphasizes the tension between Trump's push for lower interest rates and the Federal Reserve's mandate to control inflation, which remains above the target [3][5]. - Trump's tax cuts, while aimed at stimulating the economy, have contributed to rising inflation and increased fiscal pressure, complicating the Fed's decision-making [5][15]. - The ongoing debate over interest rates and fiscal policy reflects deeper issues within the U.S. economic governance, highlighting the risks of political interference in monetary policy [15][16].