13天倒计时，韩国被逼上绝路，美国张口要4000亿，李在明签不签？

Group 1 - South Korea's leadership, regardless of who is in power, remains under significant influence from the United States, impacting its foreign policy decisions [1] - President Lee Jae-myung's attempts to balance relations with China while managing U.S. expectations highlight the complexities of South Korea's geopolitical position [1][3] - The U.S. has demanded South Korea invest $400 billion, which poses a substantial challenge for the South Korean government, as it represents approximately 80% of the country's annual budget [5] Group 2 - The ongoing trade tensions initiated by the Trump administration have placed South Korea and Japan in a difficult position, with both countries appearing on the initial sanctions list [3] - Japan's Prime Minister expressed regret over the U.S. tariffs, while South Korea has shown signs of compromise, facing immense pressure from the proposed 25% tariffs [3][5] - The U.S. has proposed stringent conditions for trade agreements, including the opening of agricultural markets and the establishment of a $400 billion investment fund, which could severely restrict South Korea's economic autonomy [5][9] Group 3 - The investment fund proposal, inspired by a previous suggestion from Japan's SoftBank founder, has been criticized as a means for the U.S. to exert control over South Korea's economic resources [7] - South Korea's government has not outright rejected the U.S. conditions, indicating a potential acceptance of the investment demands, which raises concerns about national sovereignty [9] - The U.S. demands, including the lifting of beef import bans and increased agricultural imports, could lead to significant domestic backlash in South Korea, reminiscent of past protests against U.S. agricultural policies [9][10] Group 4 - The overall situation reflects a dynamic where South Korea is perceived as an economic target by the U.S., raising questions about its ability to navigate these pressures effectively [10] - The ongoing tariff war and the need for strategic negotiations place South Korea in a precarious position, with the potential for long-term economic implications [10]