最被低估的考试形式：公考行测

Group 1 - The article argues that the value of public examination subjects like essay writing and logical reasoning is underestimated, as they address gaps in language and logic education in China [1][2][3] - It highlights that logical reasoning in public exams serves as a form of popularization of logic knowledge, which can help reduce ineffective online disputes [3][10] - The article discusses various logical fallacies commonly encountered in online discussions, emphasizing the importance of understanding these to engage in meaningful dialogue [13][15] Group 2 - The author suggests that improving reading comprehension and logical reasoning skills can mitigate misunderstandings and conflicts in online interactions [2][16] - It is noted that the practical value of data analysis skills from public exams surpasses that of high school mathematics for most professions [16] - The article recommends a television series that exemplifies the use of nuanced language similar to that found in public examination essays, indicating the relevance of these skills in real-life communication [16]