Workflow
中方说到做到,对“背刺”我们的加拿大,直接断了其财路
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-07-20 10:10

Group 1 - Canada imposed a 25% tariff on Chinese steel products in response to pressure from the United States, following the U.S. imposing a 35% tariff on Canadian products [1][3][5] - The Canadian government aims to alleviate economic pressure from the U.S. by targeting China, which is seen as a provocative move against China amid already strained relations [5][11] - China's immediate response included cutting off certain economic channels with Canada, indicating a strong stance against perceived threats to its interests [3][7] Group 2 - The Canadian steel industry faces significant challenges due to U.S. tariffs, with 91% of its steel exports going to the U.S., leading to potential layoffs and production halts [9][11] - Canada heavily relies on the U.S. for exports, with a dependency rate of 75%, making it vulnerable to U.S. trade policies [11][13] - Canadian farmers and businesses express disappointment with the government's approach, as losing access to the Chinese market could severely impact their operations [11][13] Group 3 - Australia has successfully negotiated to restore canola seed exports to China, which could undermine Canada's market position in this sector [7][14] - The total canola seed export volume from Canada for 2023-2024 is projected at 6.859 million tons, with 64% of that going to China, highlighting the importance of the Chinese market [7] - China's response to Canada's tariffs is characterized as a rational choice based on international rules and national interests, serving as a warning to other countries about the consequences of antagonizing China [14][16]