华尔街嗅到政治风暴，交易员紧急布局“鲍威尔对冲”策略

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the market's reaction to the potential firing of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell by President Trump, highlighting investment strategies that involve buying short-term U.S. Treasury bonds while selling long-term ones due to anticipated changes in monetary policy and inflation concerns [1][2]. Group 1: Market Reactions and Strategies - Citigroup's James van Geelen advised approximately 50,000 clients to buy two-year U.S. Treasury bonds and sell ten-year bonds, anticipating that a new Fed chair would likely follow Trump's interest rate cut demands, leading to lower short-term yields [1]. - The strategy, termed "Powell hedge," reflects a broader concern among Wall Street investors regarding the potential loss of Fed independence and its implications for inflation and interest rates [1][5]. - Other institutions, including RBC and Allspring, share similar views, indicating a shift in perception regarding the Fed's independence and the need for protective measures in investment strategies [1][5]. Group 2: Economic and Fiscal Context - The backdrop for these trading strategies includes expectations of a slowing U.S. economy and rising debt and deficit levels, with the threat to Powell's position seen as an additional factor [2]. - Market reactions to news about Powell's potential firing included a significant rise in the 30-year Treasury yield and a drop in the dollar against the euro, illustrating the immediate impact of political developments on financial markets [6]. Group 3: Future Implications and Predictions - Analysts predict that the likelihood of Powell being dismissed remains low, with a 22% chance of him leaving by 2025, up from 18% the previous week [5]. - The article notes that if the Fed maintains its current interest rates but experiences dissent among members, this uncertainty could lead to higher long-term yields, further complicating the Fed's position amid political pressures [8][9]. - The potential for a loss of Fed independence, combined with inflationary pressures from tariffs and fiscal policy changes, could create a challenging environment for monetary policy moving forward [8].