Core Viewpoint - Tesla is facing a five-day court confrontation with the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) regarding allegations of misleading advertising related to its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) technologies, which could significantly impact its operations in California, the largest market for electric vehicles in the U.S. [1][3] Group 1: Legal Issues - The California DMV accuses Tesla of making false or misleading claims about its Autopilot and FSD capabilities, stating that the vehicles can complete trips without driver intervention, which violates California's consumer protection laws [3] - Tesla argues that the DMV's claims are taken out of context and that the company has always indicated the need for driver supervision, emphasizing that the technology is not fully autonomous [3] - The court has not accepted Tesla's defense that the DMV had implicitly approved the use of the "Autopilot" and "FSD" branding since 2014, and the case is set to proceed to trial in 2024 [3] Group 2: Market Impact - California accounts for one-third of all electric vehicle sales in the U.S., making it a critical market for Tesla [3] - If the court grants the DMV's request to suspend Tesla's manufacturing and dealer licenses for at least 30 days, it could jeopardize Tesla's performance targets for 2025 and exacerbate cash flow pressures [3] - The ongoing legal challenges, including a jury trial in Florida related to a fatal accident involving a Model S, could lead to broader regulatory scrutiny of autonomous driving marketing practices across the U.S. [4]
特斯拉加州法庭激战在即,自动驾驶宣传涉误导消费者