“中华人民共和国从未统治过台湾”的谬论当休矣

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that the People's Republic of China (PRC) has consistently exercised sovereignty over Taiwan, countering claims made by Taiwanese authorities that Taiwan is not part of China and has never been governed by the PRC [1][4]. Summary by Sections Representation Rights - The PRC is recognized as the sole legitimate government of China by the international community, which grants it representation rights over Taiwan as part of China [1][2]. - International organizations require the PRC's consent for Taiwan's participation, and Taiwan can only join under non-sovereign designations [2]. Sovereignty and Diplomatic Relations - Countries that establish diplomatic relations with the PRC must sever official ties with Taiwan, reflecting the PRC's sovereignty over Taiwan [3]. - The PRC actively opposes any military alliances or arms sales to Taiwan by other nations, further asserting its claim to sovereignty [3]. Protection of Taiwanese Citizens - The PRC ensures the safety and legal rights of Taiwanese citizens abroad, demonstrating its jurisdiction over Taiwan through consular actions [3]. Jurisdictional Authority - The PRC maintains judicial jurisdiction over individuals in Taiwan who violate national laws, as evidenced by recent legal opinions targeting "Taiwan independence" advocates [4][5]. - The PRC conducts administrative enforcement in areas controlled by Taiwan, such as maritime law enforcement in the Taiwan Strait [5]. - The PRC has successfully extradited Taiwanese suspects from foreign countries, reinforcing its legal jurisdiction over Taiwanese citizens [5]. Military Control - The PRC conducts military exercises around Taiwan, asserting its military jurisdiction and sovereignty over the region [6]. Legitimacy of Taiwanese Authority - The article posits that the Taiwanese authorities lack legal legitimacy to govern Taiwan, as the PRC has historically inherited sovereignty over the region since 1949 [6][7]. - The distinction between "de facto control" by Taiwan and "legal ownership" by the PRC is emphasized, arguing that Taiwan's governance does not equate to legal sovereignty [7].