2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao·2025-07-22 23:18Core Viewpoint - The recent regulatory talks with major food delivery platforms like Ele.me, Meituan, and JD.com signal a shift in the aggressive subsidy strategies that have characterized the industry, indicating a need for more sustainable promotional practices [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions and Industry Response - The State Administration for Market Regulation has urged platforms to standardize their promotional behaviors, suggesting that the current subsidy wars need to be moderated [1]. - Multiple restaurant industry associations have called for a halt to aggressive subsidies, citing that such practices have led to unsustainable pricing and profit pressures on traditional dining establishments [2]. Group 2: Impact on Businesses - Some businesses have reported significant order increases due to subsidies, with one brand noting a nearly 30% rise in orders since May, although profit margins have been squeezed [3][4]. - The average profit margin for many businesses has reportedly decreased by 10% to 30% during subsidy campaigns, highlighting the financial strain on restaurants [3]. Group 3: Challenges Faced by Restaurants - Restaurants face operational challenges due to sudden spikes in low-priced orders, which can overwhelm delivery capabilities and degrade service quality [4]. - Smaller brands are particularly disadvantaged, as they struggle to compete for visibility and customer engagement against larger chains that benefit from platform resources [4]. Group 4: Future of Subsidy Strategies - Experts suggest that the focus should shift from mere subsidies to enhancing quality and efficiency in service delivery, with a call for platforms to develop better operational tools for small businesses [9]. - The potential for a transition from a "traffic competition" model to a "quality competition" model is seen as crucial for the long-term sustainability of the industry [9].