Group 1 - Trump's recent political and economic challenges highlight a series of setbacks, including failed attempts to dismiss Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and confrontations with Elon Musk over government contracts [4][13][19] - The imposition of tariffs on Brazil faced immediate backlash, with Brazilian President Lula publicly criticizing Trump's understanding of international trade [10][25] - Trump's approach to governance reflects a business mindset that oversimplifies complex political and economic issues, leading to significant miscalculations [7][33] Group 2 - The Federal Reserve's independence is legally protected, making Trump's attempts to influence monetary policy problematic, as he faced opposition even from within his party [15][35] - Trump's threats to cancel SpaceX's government contracts were countered by the critical role SpaceX plays in national security and space operations, forcing a reconsideration of his stance [21][24] - The ongoing tariff policies have resulted in delays and pushback from domestic stakeholders, including farmers and manufacturers, indicating a disconnect between Trump's policies and their economic impact [12][27] Group 3 - The technology regulation landscape has become increasingly complicated, with Trump's attempts to roll back restrictions facing resistance from both domestic and international entities [28][32] - The response from allies, particularly the EU, to Trump's unilateral trade actions demonstrates the potential for significant geopolitical repercussions [32][35] - Trump's reliance on a confrontational style has led to a series of policy reversals and delays, suggesting a need for a more nuanced approach to governance [36]
特朗普遭“三连败”,手握大权的白宫老大,动不了商人马斯克!
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-07-23 09:10