向上社交为何会失败？

Group 1 - The article discusses the allure and complexities of upward social networking, highlighting its appeal as a means to access elite circles and resources [2][4][34] - It emphasizes the structured hierarchy within social events, categorizing individuals into distinct roles such as "whales" (super-rich), "girls" (models), "brokers" (intermediaries), and "lettuce" (upper-middle-class) [5][6][12] - The dynamics of power and beauty are explored, indicating that while beauty grants access, it does not equate to equal power within these social settings [20][21][22] Group 2 - The article notes that individuals engage in upward social networking not just for tangible benefits but also for the thrill of proximity to wealth and status [13][16][34] - It highlights the self-deception among brokers who believe they can leverage their connections for future opportunities, despite the inherent power imbalances [24][27][32] - The text concludes that upward social networking is deeply rooted in structural inequalities, making it a challenging and often unfulfilling pursuit [34][36][38]