Spotify开始恰死人饭了？

Core Viewpoint - Spotify has been accused of publishing AI-generated songs on the official pages of deceased artists without authorization or proper labeling, raising ethical concerns about the platform's practices and respect for artistic legacies [3][5][9]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Spotify has been found to feature AI-generated songs attributed to deceased artists like Blaze Foley and Guy Clark, with no prior communication or authorization from their estate managers [5][7]. - The song "Together" appeared on Foley's page, attributed to an unknown artist "Syntax Error," and was criticized for not resembling Foley's style [5][9]. - Following media exposure and public pressure, Spotify removed the AI-generated songs and cited its "deceptive content policy" as the reason for the removal [9][10]. Group 2: Ethical and Operational Concerns - The incident highlights a lack of preventive measures by Spotify, which has outsourced content review responsibilities to vulnerable groups like estate managers and family members of deceased artists [14][15]. - The platform's reactive approach to content management raises questions about its commitment to protecting the rights and legacies of artists [15][36]. - Other social media platforms have implemented measures to protect the accounts of deceased users, contrasting with Spotify's current practices [16][20][28]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Spotify is urged to establish protective measures for the accounts of confirmed deceased artists, such as setting them to a "protected" status to prevent misuse [34][36]. - The platform should promote transparency in content generation by requiring clear labeling of AI-generated content versus human-created works [36]. - A proactive approach is necessary to avoid future controversies and maintain user trust, as continued negligence could lead to broader industry backlash and legal challenges [38].