为讨好美国不惜得罪中国？7月25日，中方反击传来新消息

Group 1 - The Canadian government's imposition of tariffs on Chinese steel is a reaction to potential U.S. sanctions, revealing a short-sighted strategy [1][3] - Canada has abandoned significant agricultural orders from China in an attempt to appease the U.S., which is seen as a poor trade-off [5][9] - The tariffs have led to increased costs for Canadian steel manufacturers, as they rely on imported raw materials from China, resulting in financial losses [5][11] Group 2 - In response to Canada's tariffs, Australia has capitalized on the situation by increasing agricultural exports to China, benefiting from the shift in trade dynamics [7][13] - The Canadian agricultural sector is facing severe challenges, with farmers struggling to manage excess grain and seeking loan extensions due to financial strain [9][15] - The political fallout in Canada includes significant backlash from farmers and opposition parties, questioning the government's trade strategy and its impact on the economy [15][19] Group 3 - The situation serves as a lesson in international trade, emphasizing the complexity of trade wars and the need for strategic planning [17][19] - Australia has demonstrated a flexible approach to trade, balancing firmness and adaptability, which has allowed it to benefit from the changing market conditions [20][22] - China's response to the tariffs has been strategic, using market dynamics to reinforce its position while supporting alternative partners [17][22]