美国刚撂下狠话，欧盟转身找上中国，真心合作还是另有所图？

Core Viewpoint - The European Union (EU) is seeking to pivot towards China for cooperation in response to the escalating trade tensions and tariff threats from the United States, raising questions about the sincerity of this shift and its implications for EU-China relations [1][6]. Group 1: EU's Response to US Tariffs - The EU is under significant pressure from the US, which has threatened to increase tariffs on EU goods, leading to a chaotic internal situation within the EU [1]. - The EU has historically aligned with the US in international matters, but the recent tariff threats have prompted a reevaluation of this stance, with China emerging as a potential partner [1][2]. - The EU's attempts to negotiate lower tariffs with the US have failed, resulting in a hardening of the US position and increased tariff rates, which has left the EU in a difficult position [2]. Group 2: EU-China Relations - The EU has been inconsistent in its approach to China, balancing the need for economic cooperation with the pressure to align with US policies, including sanctions against Russia and investigations into Chinese electric vehicles [5][6]. - During her visit to China, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the importance of deepening trade relations with China, asserting that this is not solely a reaction to deteriorating US relations [6]. - The EU's recent sanctions against certain Chinese entities, while attempting to appease the US, have complicated its relationship with China and may hinder future cooperation [4][5]. Group 3: Strategic Considerations - The EU's engagement with China is seen as a dual strategy: seeking economic benefits while also using the relationship as leverage in negotiations with the US [6]. - China has expressed a clear stance on its expectations from the EU, indicating that it will not tolerate any attempts to manipulate the relationship for US interests [5][6]. - The EU's ongoing balancing act between the US and China could lead to unfavorable outcomes if it continues to waver in its commitments [6].