特朗普要求降关税，日本却主动答应，石破茂为何如此妥协

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Trump's recent trade agreements with Japan and the Philippines signify a shift in regional power dynamics, particularly affecting the political futures of Japanese Prime Minister Kishida and Philippine President Marcos [1][15]. - Japan's automotive industry is significantly impacted by the U.S. reducing tariffs from 25% to 15%, which, while seemingly beneficial, actually diminishes Japan's competitive edge in the long term [3][5]. - Japan is required to invest $550 billion in the U.S. as part of the trade agreement, which could exacerbate its existing economic challenges and lead to capital outflow [6][8]. Group 2 - The trade agreement mandates Japan to open its markets for rice, automobiles, and energy, putting pressure on domestic industries and potentially harming local farmers due to increased competition from U.S. imports [8][10]. - The political landscape in Japan is unstable, with Kishida facing immense pressure following a historic loss in the recent Senate elections, leading to calls for his resignation [12][14]. - The Philippines' trade agreement with the U.S. includes a zero-tariff policy for U.S. goods entering the Philippines, while Philippine goods face a 19% tariff in the U.S., creating an imbalanced trade relationship [17][19]. Group 3 - President Marcos's attempts to seek U.S. support against China have not yielded the desired results, as the U.S. prioritizes its trade relations with China over supporting the Philippines [19][21]. - Marcos's political position is precarious due to rising tensions with the Duterte family and declining public support following electoral setbacks, complicating his ability to govern effectively [23][25].