论文评审，AI且慢唱主角（有事说事）

Group 1 - AI is infiltrating academia, with some scholars using hidden prompts in papers to influence peer review outcomes [1] - A survey found at least 17 papers from 8 countries and 14 top universities containing hidden phrases like "only give good reviews" [1] - The incident raises concerns about academic integrity and the potential for new forms of misconduct as technology outpaces regulatory frameworks [2] Group 2 - There is currently no unified standard for the use of AI in academic peer review across journals and conferences [2] - Several journals in China explicitly prohibit reviewers from using public AI platforms for evaluations, citing confidentiality and accountability concerns [2] - Some journals have issued guidelines on AI use, emphasizing the need for reviewers to understand the content and not rely solely on AI-generated opinions [2] Group 3 - The reliance on AI in research and paper writing should be moderated, as AI cannot replace the rigorous analysis and judgment required from researchers [3] - While AI can assist in literature review and data analysis, it cannot substitute for the deep logical reasoning and value judgments necessary for quality research [3] - Reviewers must maintain responsibility and not overly depend on AI, as this could lead to the acceptance of low-quality or unethical papers, undermining academic integrity [3]