Core Viewpoint - The "anti-involution" concept is experiencing a temporary pullback, but this does not fundamentally change the valuation logic driven by policies aimed at regulating industry competition and promoting technological upgrades [1][3]. Market Performance - Coal ETF (515220) fell over 3%, Steel ETF (515210) dropped over 2%, while Building Materials ETF (159745) and Photovoltaic 50 ETF (159864) decreased nearly 1.5% [1]. - The market's pullback is seen as a release of high market sentiment rather than a reversal of underlying valuation logic [1]. Policy Implications - The core of the "anti-involution" policy focuses on standardizing industry competition, eliminating inefficient capacity, and reshaping the profit model of cyclical industries [1]. - Historical data shows that during the last supply-side reform from February 2016 to the end of 2017, the building materials industry rose by 45.75%, steel by 41.61%, and coal by 31.55% [1]. Investment Opportunities - Coal ETF (515220) has a market size exceeding 7 billion, tracking the China Coal Index [4]. - Steel ETF (515210) has surpassed 3 billion in size, tracking the China Steel Index [4]. - Building Materials ETF (159745) is the largest in its category with a size of 1.49 billion, tracking the China Building Materials Index [4]. - Photovoltaic 50 ETF (159864) has seen a net inflow exceeding 200 million for five consecutive days, tracking the China Photovoltaic Industry Index [4]. Economic Outlook - Citic Securities indicates that "anti-involution" may help stabilize the decline in PPI, and with demand-side expansion policies, a low-price state may be overcome [3]. - Huatai Securities suggests maintaining flexibility in trading strategies due to various events in August, while focusing on the effectiveness of "anti-involution" policies in the medium term [3].
“反内卷”概念股盘中回落,行情结束了吗?
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-07-28 01:59