前欧盟官员懊恼：如果当初配合中国反制美国，欧盟如今能拿到更好的条件

Core Viewpoint - The new US-EU trade agreement has been criticized for being biased and detrimental to European interests, with calls for a stronger EU response to US tariffs [1][3][16]. Group 1: Trade Agreement Details - The US has reduced tariffs on EU goods from previously proposed rates of 20% and 30% to 15% [3]. - The agreement includes a commitment for the EU to purchase $750 billion worth of energy products from the US and plans for $600 billion in US investments, though the specifics remain unclear [3]. Group 2: EU's Response and Strategy - Analysts believe that the EU's response to US tariffs has been too slow and ineffective, with missed opportunities for a stronger stance alongside China [4][5]. - The EU had initially prepared a three-point plan to address the trade imbalance, which included increasing imports of US goods and proposing mutual tariff reductions [5]. Group 3: Internal Disagreements and Challenges - There are significant internal divisions within the EU regarding the approach to the US, with some officials advocating for a tougher stance while others prefer a more conciliatory approach [10][11]. - The EU's reliance on US security guarantees has further complicated its ability to confront US trade policies [14]. Group 4: Criticism of the Agreement - Critics, including European officials, argue that the agreement represents a capitulation to US demands and fails to provide equitable terms for Europe [16]. - The agreement's provisions for increased US military technology purchases and investment commitments are seen as detrimental to European industry and employment [16].