因标点空行就错失亿元大单冤不冤？

Core Viewpoint - The rejection of bids due to minor formatting issues, such as punctuation and spacing, raises concerns about the fairness and transparency of the bidding process in the construction industry [2][3]. Group 1: Bid Rejection Reasons - Several bidders, including China Metallurgical Construction Group, China State Construction Engineering Corporation, and Beijing Urban Construction Group, were disqualified for not adhering to the "dark marking" requirements in their bid documents [2]. - The bid documents are considered core legal documents that must respond comprehensively to the tender requirements, and any failure to comply can lead to invalidation of the bid [2]. Group 2: Regulatory and Market Implications - There is a suggestion that entities involved in potentially misleading the evaluation experts should be reported to regulatory authorities for further investigation into possible bribery or misconduct [3]. - The bidding market is a crucial part of the national unified market, and excessive formatting requirements may hinder fair competition among suppliers [3]. Group 3: Formatting Requirements - The requirements for "dark marking" vary across regions, and as technology evolves, some outdated formatting conditions are being revised [4]. - Even in the digital era, electronic bids can be rejected due to issues like poor scan quality or improper electronic signatures, indicating that formatting issues remain a significant concern [4].