武大图书馆诬告案，是一场规模宏大的校园霸凌

Group 1 - The article discusses the limitations of the law in addressing issues like online violence and campus bullying, highlighting the case of the Wuhan University library false accusation as a classic example of these problems [1] - It emphasizes that campus bullies often target those perceived as weak, showcasing the ability of bullies to identify vulnerable individuals [2] - The article points out that the victim, Xiao, lacked awareness of human malice and was easily intimidated, leading to a series of unfortunate events [2][3] Group 2 - The response of individuals who are not easily bullied can differ significantly, with some choosing to confront their accusers aggressively [4] - The article illustrates how bystanders often contribute to the perpetuation of bullying by remaining passive, akin to a crowd ignoring violence [5] - It criticizes the typical school response to bullying, which often involves equal punishment for both parties, rather than a thorough investigation [6] Group 3 - The article raises doubts about the plausibility of the accusations against Xiao, questioning the circumstances and logic behind the claims [7][8][9] - It discusses the long-term psychological impact of bullying on victims, noting that the scars from such experiences can last a lifetime [10] - The article concludes that the consequences for bullies are often minimal, as societal memory fades and they may continue to thrive without accountability [14][15]