大事不妙，中国资产被扫货，已断美3条财路，鲁比奥逼中方守规矩

Group 1 - South Korean investors have significantly increased their investment in Chinese markets, with cumulative trading volume exceeding 5.4 billion USD by July 15, 2025, marking a shift from reliance on the US market [1][3] - China has surpassed Japan and Europe to become the second-largest overseas investment destination for South Korean capital, indicating a structural change in global capital flows [3] - The preference for Chinese stocks is evident, with major tech companies like Xiaomi, BYD, and CATL attracting substantial inflows, reflecting South Korean investors' keen interest in emerging technology sectors [6][7] Group 2 - The capital migration is driven by China's structural attractiveness, with Citigroup upgrading its rating on the Chinese stock market to "overweight" and setting a target for the Hang Seng Index at 25,000 points [8] - In contrast, South Korean funds have sold off US tech stocks, with a net outflow of 230 million USD, as valuation bubbles in companies like Tesla and Nvidia burst [9] - The shift in capital is accompanied by a significant reduction in the proportion of South Korean retail investors trading US stocks, which fell from over 60% to 42%, while the share of Chinese markets rose from 15% to 38% [7] Group 3 - The US-China strategic competition has intensified, particularly in the energy sector, with China halting imports of crude oil, LNG, and coal from the US for the first time in three years, leading to significant revenue losses for US energy companies [11][13] - China's energy procurement has shifted towards countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia, allowing for cost savings and greater energy security [15][17] - The diversification of energy sources has put pressure on traditional US energy states, with political forces in Texas advocating for a reassessment of tariffs on China due to the impact on the energy industry [17][20] Group 4 - US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's contradictory statements regarding China reflect the internal political tensions in the US, as he balances the "America First" agenda with the economic pressures from capital outflows [22][24] - Rubio's comments on the South Korean capital shift to China being a "short-term market fluctuation" contrast with his private requests for evaluations of tariff policies on US stock liquidity [26][28] - The failure of the US strategic narrative is highlighted by the overwhelming support for China in international votes, indicating a disconnect in US foreign policy [28][30]