“烂尾楼”执行纠纷破局，最高法院拓宽买房人权益

Core Viewpoint - The recent judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court addresses the protection of homebuyers' rights in cases of unfinished properties and disputes over property execution, emphasizing the prioritization of living rights over monetary claims [4][18]. Group 1: Homebuyer Rights and Legal Interpretations - The Supreme Court's interpretation expands the protection of homebuyers, allowing claims based on "housing for family living needs" rather than just "the only housing" [6][18]. - The interpretation clarifies that if a homebuyer has not completed property registration due to reasons beyond their control, they are entitled to protection [18]. - The interpretation allows homebuyers to request the release of their funds from frozen pre-sale accounts under certain conditions, enhancing their ability to recover payments [10][18]. Group 2: Judicial Challenges and Execution Disputes - The interpretation aims to resolve challenges in execution disputes, particularly those involving unfinished properties, by providing clearer guidelines for courts [12][18]. - There is a significant increase in execution objection lawsuits, particularly related to pre-sale properties, highlighting systemic issues in property management and execution processes [14][15]. - The interpretation addresses the need for better regulation of pre-sale funds to prevent misuse and protect consumer interests [11][14]. Group 3: Implications for Urban Migrants - The case involving a migrant worker underscores the importance of protecting the rights of urban migrants who purchase homes for living purposes, as their needs are prioritized over creditors' monetary claims [7][18]. - The judicial interpretation reflects a broader commitment to support the living and working conditions of urban migrants, recognizing their unique challenges in housing [7][18].