Midea Group(SZ:000333) Zheng Quan Shi Bao Wang·2025-07-29 12:06Core Viewpoint - Regulatory authorities have introduced multiple policies to encourage listed companies to repurchase and cancel shares, leading to a significant increase in the importance of stock buybacks among these companies [1] Group 1: Market Performance - On July 29, the A-share market saw a rise in both volume and price, with the Shanghai Composite Index increasing by 0.33%, the Shenzhen Component Index by 0.64%, and the ChiNext Index by 1.86% [2] - Sectors such as optical modules and pharmaceuticals led the gains, with the CRO concept index surging by 6.37% and the optical module concept index rising by 5.36% [2] Group 2: Stock Buyback Activity - In July, A-share listed companies executed buybacks totaling 140.12 billion yuan, a 12.06% increase from June, marking the fourth consecutive month with buybacks exceeding 100 billion yuan [3] - The total buyback amount for the year reached approximately 889.93 billion yuan [3] Group 3: Individual Company Buybacks - 27 companies repurchased over 1 billion yuan in July, with Midea Group, TCL Technology, Guotai Junan, and Baosteel each exceeding 5 billion yuan in buybacks [4] - Midea Group announced two buyback plans with a maximum total of 130 billion yuan, having repurchased 15.1 billion yuan and 9.73 billion yuan under these plans [4] Group 4: Financing Support for Buybacks - The People's Bank of China and other regulatory bodies introduced a policy to establish special loans for stock buybacks, significantly reducing financing costs for companies [5] - As of this year, the maximum amount of special loans for buybacks reached 919.17 billion yuan, with 595.05 billion yuan allocated specifically for stock repurchases [5] Group 5: Valuation and Performance - Among the 553 companies that announced buyback plans this year, 30 companies have a maximum buyback amount of 10 billion yuan or more, with Midea Group, CATL, and Kweichow Moutai leading [6] - 32 companies have a current price-to-earnings ratio below the 30% percentile for the year, indicating potential undervaluation [7]