汪苏泷和张碧晨在争什么，我搞明白了

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the original singer of the song "Year Ring" has sparked significant public interest, highlighting the complexities of copyright and performance rights in the music industry [3][5][12]. Group 1: Event Overview - Influencer @Wangzai Xiao Qiao announced a masked concert with ticket prices ranging from 268 to 968 yuan, which led to public scrutiny due to her lack of original songs and high ticket prices [3]. - The situation escalated when past comments by @Wangzai Xiao Qiao regarding the song "Year Ring" resurfaced, leading to a heated debate about the song's original artist [5][6]. Group 2: Legal Perspectives - Legal experts clarified that "original singer" is not a legal term; instead, it refers to the performer who first publicly released a recording, which in this case is Zhang Bichen [7][9]. - The dispute centers on Zhang Bichen claiming to be the sole original singer based on the timing of her release, while Wang Sulong asserts that "Year Ring" has dual original singers due to his authorship rights [11][12]. Group 3: Copyright Implications - The rights of the original singer are limited to performance rights and do not include the broader copyright ownership held by the songwriter [9][12]. - The concept of "dual original singers" is theoretically possible if the contracts allow for multiple versions, but this requires clear contractual agreements [14][16]. Group 4: Industry Insights - The incident reflects a broader issue in the music industry regarding the recognition of original artists versus copyright holders, emphasizing the need for clarity in contracts and communication among involved parties [19][22]. - The discussion also highlights the emotional and commercial implications of such disputes, as artists navigate their identities and rights within the industry [22].