美财长透露中美谈判细节：中国为捍卫主权宁愿支付100%的石油关税

Core Points - The U.S. Treasury Secretary has revealed that Congress is considering a "secondary sanctions" bill targeting countries purchasing Russian oil, with potential punitive tariffs of up to 100% [1][4] - China, as the largest importer of Russian oil, has emphasized its commitment to energy sovereignty, stating it would rather pay the full tariffs than cease imports [1][6] - The proposed sanctions have raised concerns among European allies and the global energy market, highlighting the geopolitical tensions surrounding energy supplies [4][10] Group 1: U.S. Sanctions Strategy - The U.S. is extending its sanctions from direct actions against Russia to its trading partners, aiming to cut off Russia's energy revenue [4][8] - The proposed punitive tariffs could reach as high as 500%, indicating a significant escalation in the U.S. strategy [4][10] - The U.S. aims to leverage these sanctions as a political tool to influence Russia's actions in the Ukraine conflict [8][16] Group 2: China's Response and Energy Policy - China has firmly stated that energy imports are a matter of national sovereignty and will not accept external interference [6][12] - The country is likely to continue diversifying its energy sources to reduce reliance on any single supplier, including strengthening ties with regions rich in energy resources [12][14] - China's potential response to U.S. sanctions may include controlling rare earth resources, which are critical for high-tech industries, as a countermeasure [12][14] Group 3: Global Implications and Reactions - The situation reflects a broader trend of increasing skepticism towards U.S. unilateral sanctions among other nations, with countries like India and Turkey continuing to import Russian oil without facing direct sanctions [18][20] - The ongoing tensions over Russian oil imports signify a deeper struggle over international order, national sovereignty, and global strategic positioning [18][20] - The outcome of this geopolitical contest will have significant implications for international relations and the stability of global trade systems [20]