海莱云视继续质疑百合股份，官方说明曝光

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding Baihe Co., Ltd. (603102.SH) has intensified following the "kickback" incident, with both Baihe and the whistleblower, Hailai Yunshi, presenting conflicting claims regarding the authenticity and legality of a contract review form [1][6]. Group 1: Contract Review Form Authenticity - Hailai Yunshi asserts that the disputed contract review form was obtained legally during the public trial phase of a case, as it was part of the documents submitted by Baihe to the court [3][4]. - The company emphasizes that the contract review form contains essential information such as incentive targets, incentive policies, contract risks, and product gross margins, and indicates that it has been approved by various management levels [4]. Group 2: Legal and Financial Implications - Hailai Yunshi argues that the process of obtaining evidence is compliant with legal standards, as the trial was public and the case is not confidential, allowing for document review post-trial [4]. - Baihe Co. has consistently denied any payments of kickbacks or fees to Liu Yongtao or related parties, asserting that the contract review form does not include any kickback content and that any related statements were merely personal proposals from business personnel [5][6]. Group 3: Ongoing Developments - As of July 28, Baihe Co. has refrained from providing detailed responses regarding the allegations, citing the ongoing second trial as a reason for their limited commentary [6]. - The situation remains unresolved, with both parties maintaining their positions, and market observers are closely monitoring the developments for clarity on the matter [6].