Workflow
乘龙卡车再回应理想i8撞重卡:活着才有资格谈理想,碰撞视频用的旧车

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collision test video involving the Li Auto i8 and a Chenglong truck has sparked significant industry attention, with Chenglong Truck asserting that the video misrepresents actual traffic conditions and calling for a rational perspective on safety [3][4][5]. Group 1: Chenglong Truck's Response - Chenglong Truck issued a statement emphasizing the importance of adhering to traffic regulations and regular maintenance to ensure safety, rather than relying solely on test results [4]. - The company has raised concerns about the legality of the video used by Li Auto, claiming it constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, potentially violating multiple laws [16]. - Chenglong Truck's social media response indicated that their legal department is addressing the situation, and they criticized the portrayal of their vehicle in the test [7][16]. Group 2: Li Auto's Position - Li Auto defended the collision test, stating it was conducted by a third-party testing agency and adhered to all relevant standards, asserting that the test was a simulation of real-world scenarios [15]. - The company has invited further testing to validate the results, suggesting transparency in the testing process [15]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The incident has drawn attention from the broader automotive industry, with Dongfeng Group expressing support for Chenglong Truck in protecting its brand reputation and legal rights [4]. - The controversy has led to discussions about competition and safety standards within the industry, highlighting the need for responsible marketing practices [4][15].