尊湃窃密案一审宣判，守护华为商业秘密，打击窃取势力重要一击！

Core Viewpoint - The case against Zunpai Communications Technology (Nanjing) Co., Ltd. for infringing Huawei's trade secrets marks a significant step in China's intellectual property protection, highlighting the severity of technology theft in the semiconductor industry [1][9][14] Group 1: Case Background - The Shanghai Pudong New District People's Court sentenced Zhang Kun, the main perpetrator, to six years in prison and a fine of 3 million yuan, prohibiting him from engaging in the chip industry for five years [1][6] - The case, described as the "most severe technology theft case in China's semiconductor field," involved a systematic plan to steal Huawei's core technologies, particularly related to Wi-Fi 6 chips [1][3] Group 2: Execution of Theft - After leaving Huawei, Zhang Kun quickly assembled a team and lured over 20 Huawei engineers, many still under non-compete agreements, to join Zunpai [3][5] - The technical assessment revealed that 40 key technology points used by Zunpai overlapped with Huawei's technology by over 90%, indicating a blatant "copy-paste" theft [3][5] Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Outcomes - In April 2023, Huawei initiated an internal investigation upon noticing signs of technology leakage, leading to a police operation that arrested 14 individuals involved in the theft [5][10] - The court ordered the complete freezing of Zunpai's cash assets amounting to 99.65 million yuan and mandated the destruction of all related technical materials [5][6] Group 4: Broader Implications - Huawei reported losses exceeding 100 million yuan due to the technology leak and has filed a civil lawsuit for economic compensation [9] - The case serves as a warning to investors about the importance of ensuring the legality and compliance of technology sources when investing in startups [9][10] - The successful prosecution reflects the strong capabilities of Chinese law enforcement in combating commercial secret crimes, showcasing a commitment to protecting national technological security [10][12] Group 5: Future Considerations - The case emphasizes the need for companies to enhance their internal security measures, including employee confidentiality training and strict management of technical documents [12][14] - It signals a clear message that China will not tolerate any infringement on original technology, reinforcing the importance of intellectual property rights in the global tech landscape [14]