要收网了！中美谈判失利后，美国迅速调整印度韩国关税策略

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the trade negotiations between China and the United States have not made substantial progress, with the possibility of increasing tariffs on China to triple digits being mentioned by the U.S. negotiation team [1] - China has responded firmly, indicating a willingness to negotiate but also readiness to retaliate if necessary, emphasizing an open-door policy for talks [3] - The U.S. appears to be unwilling to make significant concessions in the negotiations, aiming to maintain its position as a major global economic power [4] Group 2 - On July 30, President Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting August 1, citing India's unfair trade practices as the reason for this punitive measure [6][8] - Trump also announced a new trade agreement with South Korea, which includes a 15% tariff on South Korean goods, with South Korea expected to invest $350 billion in the U.S. [10][11] - The U.S. strategy of applying different tariff levels to neighboring countries like India and South Korea is seen as a way to control these nations and prevent them from distancing themselves from U.S. trade policies [13] Group 3 - The current tariff strategy indicates that the U.S. offers the lowest tariffs to the UK at 10%, followed by the EU, Japan, and South Korea at 15%, while countries like India are at 25% [15] - It is suggested that the reasonable bottom line for U.S.-China negotiations could be around a 20% tariff, which would facilitate smoother discussions if China agrees [15] - The U.S. President's strategic approach reflects a calculated plan to maintain leverage over China while managing relationships with neighboring countries [17]