美财长对华态度急转，非心血来潮，多国紧盯中方后续回应

Core Viewpoint - The sudden shift in the U.S. Treasury Secretary's stance towards China reflects a strategic retreat by the Trump administration after facing multiple failures in its aggressive policies [1][3][19]. Group 1: Energy Policy - Trump's initial strategy involved leveraging energy sanctions against countries purchasing Russian oil to create global supply tensions, aiming to address domestic economic issues [5][7]. - The OPEC+ decision to increase oil production undermined Trump's plan, preventing the desired volatility in oil prices that could have pressured the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates [7][9]. Group 2: Trade and Alliances - Trump's approach to isolate China involved threatening tariffs on key allies, hoping to create a perception of U.S. dominance in international negotiations [10][12]. - While some agreements were reached with the EU and Japan, these were met with significant domestic opposition, indicating a lack of genuine commitment to U.S. demands [12][14]. Group 3: Domestic Economic Challenges - Recent labor data revealed a significant downturn in employment, comparable to post-pandemic levels, which directly challenged Trump's narrative of a strong economy [17]. - In response to negative economic reports, Trump dismissed the head of the statistics bureau, highlighting his anxiety and inability to address the underlying issues [17][19]. Group 4: Political Implications - The combination of failed external strategies and poor domestic economic performance led to a drop in Trump's approval ratings to a new low of 37%, raising concerns within the Republican Party about upcoming elections [19][21]. - The shift in U.S. policy towards China is seen as a last resort after exhausting other options, indicating a retreat from aggressive posturing to a focus on domestic crisis management [21].