Workflow
特朗普公布新计划,不许中国领先美国,不到24小时,中方定下规矩!
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-04 08:51

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the competitive stance of the U.S. in the AI sector, particularly against China, emphasizing a zero-sum mentality with a focus on domestic deregulation and investment in AI infrastructure while attempting to restrict China's access to AI technology [1] - The U.S. plans to establish American technology as the "global standard" while simultaneously restricting Chinese AI chip exports, indicating a strategy of domestic growth paired with international pressure on China [1] - China's response to the U.S. plan emphasizes an open, inclusive, and beneficial approach to AI development, advocating for cooperation rather than confrontation, which reflects confidence in its own AI capabilities and market-driven growth [1][3] Group 2 - The Chinese stance on establishing rules for the global tech ecosystem is aimed at promoting "technology for good" and collective progress, countering the Cold War mentality with a focus on building platforms to overcome barriers [3] - The article suggests that U.S. attempts at technological isolation will lead to its own isolation, indicating that the rules of the game are no longer solely determined by the U.S. [3]