Hu Xiu·2025-08-04 11:49Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the safety collision tests of the Li Auto i8 and the subsequent controversy involving Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's Chenglong trucks [1][2] - Li Auto stated that the tests were designed based on common traffic accident scenarios and were conducted by China Automotive Research Institute (CARI) [2][11] - CARI clarified that the tests were solely to verify the safety of the Li Auto i8 and did not evaluate the safety performance of other brands [3][9] Group 2 - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor responded to the controversy, claiming that their brand was misrepresented and that the testing video was used without authorization [5][4] - The company emphasized adherence to a "real-world protection" principle in their safety systems and condemned any actions that undermine industry integrity [5][4] - Both Li Auto and CARI confirmed that the i8's passenger compartment showed no significant deformation during the tests, with airbags deploying normally and no leakage or fire from the battery pack [12][16] Group 3 - Concerns were raised regarding the testing methods, with experts noting that collisions between lighter and heavier vehicles typically result in more damage to the lighter vehicle [10][20] - CARI and Li Auto maintained that the tests were conducted under scientifically rigorous standards, with CARI being a state-owned enterprise and a recognized authority in automotive testing [13][16] - There is a suggestion from industry professionals that third-party testing should be subject to public notarization to enhance credibility [19][20]