别小看印度！莫迪硬刚特朗普，手里牌够硬吗？

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles highlights India's strategic positioning against the U.S. through economic leverage, military autonomy, and diplomatic maneuvering [2][3][5] - India's economy, valued at $4.19 trillion, allows it to challenge U.S. tariffs, as exports to the U.S. only account for 2.1% of its GDP, while U.S. companies profit significantly from the Indian market [2] - The Indian pharmaceutical industry plays a crucial role in global supply chains, supplying 20% of the world's generic drugs and 60% of vaccines, which gives India leverage over U.S. healthcare costs [2] Group 2 - Despite a low per capita GDP of $2,880, India's large population of 1.46 billion presents significant consumer potential, making it a key market for U.S. companies like Walmart and Amazon [3] - India's military capabilities are advancing, with a global firepower ranking of fourth, and it is developing indigenous military technologies in collaboration with Russia, enhancing its defense autonomy [5] - India's strategic partnerships, such as with Russia for energy and military technology, provide a robust defense against U.S. pressure, exemplified by the S-400 missile system collaboration [3][5] Group 3 - India's diplomatic strategy includes a shift from supporting U.S. resolutions to advocating for its own interests, as seen in its voting patterns at the UN [6] - The rejection of the U.S.-led IPEF trade framework in favor of regional cooperation through the Shanghai Cooperation Organization indicates India's intent to challenge U.S. economic dominance [8] - India's efforts in semiconductor manufacturing and AI development reflect its ambition to reshape global supply chains and attract foreign investment, further enhancing its economic position [8] Group 4 - India's legal strategies, such as its WTO case against U.S. tariffs, demonstrate its adeptness at using established international rules to counter U.S. actions [9] - The push for reforms in international institutions like the UN Security Council and the expansion of BRICS signifies India's desire to establish a dual-track influence in global governance [9] - India's positioning as a representative of the Global South aims to garner international support while bolstering domestic nationalism, as reflected in rising public approval ratings [8][9]