特朗普“突变”：关税刀锋收回6天，连遭三拳打脸！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's unexpected delay of a new global tariff policy, which is seen as a strategic maneuver in the context of global trade tensions and domestic economic challenges [1][3]. Group 1: Tariff Policy Details - The new tariff policy, described as a "century tax increase," imposes tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on goods from 67 countries and regions, marking the largest tax rate increase in U.S. history [2]. - Tariff rates vary significantly by country, with Japan, South Korea, and New Zealand at 15%, Canada at 35%, and Syria at the highest rate of 41%. The EU's tariffs will be flexibly adjusted based on existing standards, while Vietnam is set at 20% and the UK and Brazil at 10% [2]. - Companies found to evade tariffs through "third-country transshipment" will face an additional 40% transshipment tax and will be publicly listed on a "evasion list" [2]. Group 2: Economic and Political Reactions - The announcement of the tariffs coincided with disappointing employment data, with only 14,000 new jobs added in June, the lowest in nearly a decade, leading to a significant drop in U.S. stock markets, including a 1.23% decline in the Dow Jones [8]. - Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's refusal to lower interest rates, despite Trump's pressure, highlights the limitations of Trump's influence over economic policy, indicating a loss of control [9]. - Internationally, tensions escalated as former Russian President Medvedev criticized Trump's sanctions, leading to a military response from Trump, which heightened global concerns about a potential return to Cold War dynamics [11]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - Trump's tariff strategy appears to be a high-stakes political gamble aimed at consolidating political capital amid poor domestic economic indicators and rising international tensions [15]. - The article suggests that while the tariff policy may seem like an economic offensive, its underlying intent is to bolster Trump's re-election prospects, despite the increasing risks and potential backlash from both domestic and international fronts [18].