新华社评懂车帝科普节目：辅助驾驶不等于无人驾驶，必须守牢底线

Group 1 - The article emphasizes that the confusion between assisted driving and autonomous driving is a major cause of accidents related to assisted driving [2] - It highlights that currently, there are no certified L3 autonomous driving products available in the domestic market, and all vehicles in use are L2 level, requiring constant driver supervision [2] - The article mentions that the responsibility for accidents lies with the driver unless it can be proven that a product defect caused the incident [2] Group 2 - The article discusses the increasing popularity of assisted driving among consumers, leading to some electric vehicle brands promoting intelligent driving as a core selling point, resulting in excessive marketing [2] - It notes that the Chinese automotive industry associations have called for strict adherence to the classification of automated driving to prevent false advertising and misleading statements [2] - The article stresses the importance of safety and responsible use of driving functions, urging consumers not to rely entirely on immature intelligent driving technologies [3] Group 3 - The article calls for automakers to take a responsible approach by educating the public on the correct use of assisted driving features and enhancing safety awareness [3] - It points out that the current assisted driving technology has not yet reached full autonomous driving levels and has limitations in usage scenarios [3] - The article urges automakers to clearly inform users about the capabilities and limitations of assisted driving systems to prevent dangerous situations caused by misleading promotions [3]